Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts

Sunday, May 12, 2019

Suicide: More Common Than Ever

A Rice University classmate and friend of mine – a 57 year old woman and mother of two – committed suicide on Easter Sunday. She was going through a divorce, but many of her college friends had been in contact with her one way or another in the weeks (and even the day) before she died. She seemed strong, resilient. Defiant, even. None of us saw it coming. Maybe we should have.

The suicide in 2018 of 55 year old fashion designer Kate Spade captured our collective attention, because here was a wildly successful woman who, by outward appearances, appeared to have everything going for her. Yet according to her husband she suffered from depression and anxiety (others report bipolar disorder) for years. Even so, her death came as a surprise.

Suicide in middle-aged women is on the rise. Kate Spade is not the only celebrity woman to kill herself. Actress Margot Kidder, film producer Jill Messick, model L’Wren Scott, and Mary Richardson Kennedy, estranged wife of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., have committed suicide in recent years. In fact, the suicide rate among middle age women (age 45-64) has jumped by an astounding sixty percent since 2000. The increase for women is more than double the increase for men. No one knows why.

Mental illness, substance abuse, loneliness and financial and relationship problems have all been linked to rising suicide rates. In a 2018 Wall Street Journal article, psychiatrist Samantha Boardman is quoted, saying “Life satisfaction hits an all-time low in middle age,” and, “Depression and stress are particularly high in this age group. Juggling responsibilities and managing multiple roles takes a toll and can lead to feeling overwhelmed, a loss of control and despair.” But why are people less able to cope today?

Of course, with any one suicide you don’t always know the reason(s). Did the person leave a note? (My friend didn’t, but in retrospect, some of her communications signaled a finality.) Was the suicide planned, or was it an accident? (My friend’s appears intentional.) And as the recent uptick in suicides after the Netflix series 13 Reasons Why is reported to demonstrate, suicide may be suggestible. For the survivors, questions are inevitable and often unanswerable. (Support groups are available for suicide loss survivors and can be of great benefit.)

According to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), there are multiple risk factors for suicide, and interventions and treatment will of necessity vary depending on individual circumstances. Medical therapies are most appropriate when the risk of suicide is related to underlying depression, anxiety or other mental illness. As much as we are a society that likes to medicate our problems away, medication is only a part of the solution for some, but not all, patients at risk for suicide. There is no magic bullet – or pill – for suicide prevention.

Psychiatrist Amy Barnhorst, writing in the New York Times, warned that suicide prevention is often difficult because family members rarely know someone they love is about to attempt suicide. Often that person doesn’t know herself. She advocated “tried-and-true” strategies for working with people at risk of suicide, like limiting access to what she called “lethal tools” (drugs and firearms primarily) and working as a society to improve access to resources like alcohol and drug treatment and individual therapy. “Antidepressants can’t supply employment or affordable housing, repair relationships with family members or bring on sobriety,” she wrote.

Knowing how to gauge how overwhelmed a person is, or the point beyond which there is no return, is hardly a scientific enterprise. And yet we must try, individually, as family, and as a society. Lots of people think about suicide, as it turns out (I did, as a teen). Thankfully, most never act on those thoughts (I didn’t). Common teaching is that if we think someone is depressed, we should talk to them specifically about their emotions, not judgmentally or dismissively, and even ask if they are thinking of hurting or killing themselves. That can open the door to getting professional help.

But data are conflicting about how open people are with their feelings and intentions. One study said nearly eighty percent of suicide victims deny suicidal thoughts before killing themselves. Others say that one-half to two-thirds of people who attempt suicide express thoughts about committing suicide, even if only one-third of those ever make an attempt. How do we identify and screen for those at risk for suicide? We must be willing to have an open conversation on multiple levels. Patricia Todd, a licensed professional counselor and mental health advocate who is herself the mother of a suicide victim, believes that we have a moral obligation to educate the minds and hearts of those around us about all things mental health. Only then can we begin to eradicate the debilitating stigma that is too often attached to suicide.

Our primary care providers (PCPs) are on the front line of mental health care in this country. Reportedly, three-quarters of those who commit suicide have been seen by a primary care provider in the year prior to their suicide. One might conclude that our PCPs would know patients the best and could screen patients for suicide risk. Knowing how busy PCPs are – and how little face time they have with each patient they see – it is unrealistic to expect that mental health screening questions be a routine part of every visit or intake history and physical exam on every patient. Indeed, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), an independent panel of experts that makes evidence-based recommendations about clinical preventive services, looked into this and concluded that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for suicide risk in adolescents, adults, and older adults in primary care. Nonetheless, all physicians should be willing and ready to dig deeper when patients express feelings of depression, despair, and hopelessness.

Facebook, after all, is looking. Businessinsider.com reported that Facebook has been monitoring users’ posts since 2017 for warning signs that they might be at risk of suicide, and has even sent emergency responders to users’ houses more than 3,500 times. Who knew? And based on what criteria? My friend who committed suicide was a regular Facebook poster, and Facebook apparently didn’t tag her as being at risk.

Radiologists and researchers in Pittsburgh believe they have found a way to distinguish between individuals with and without suicidal thoughts with a brain imaging technique known as functional MRI (fMRI). Even if this proves to be accurate, this is hardly a practical or cost-efficient method to screen people. It is a provocative idea nonetheless. It makes sense that suicidal brains think differently.

The bottom line is we cannot – yet – rely on computer algorithms or brain scans to identify those at risk of committing suicide. Until we have a better understanding as to why more people are killing themselves – and how to identify those at risk – every one of us must be vigilant.

What can you do? First, know what to look for. NIMH warns that suicidal thoughts or actions are a sign of extreme distress, not a harmless bid for attention, and should not be ignored. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lists twelve suicide warning signs: feeling like a burden; being isolated; increased anxiety; feeling trapped or in unbearable pain; increased substance use; looking for a way to access lethal means; increased anger or rage; extreme mood swings; expressing hopelessness; sleeping too little or too much; talking or posting about wanting to die; making plans for suicide. The National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) urges that any person exhibiting these behaviors should get care immediately: putting their affairs in order and giving away their possessions; saying goodbye to friends and family; mood shifts from despair to calm; planning, possibly by looking around to buy, steal or borrow the tools they need to complete suicide, such as a firearm or prescription medication.

Communities are starting to put together Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) programs, working with law enforcement, mental health experts and community and religious leaders to respond more effectively to those experiencing a mental health crisis. Communities that don't have this type of formal program should get one started.

If you know someone exhibiting these warning signs, take action. The CDC lists five simple steps to help someone at risk: 1.Ask; 2.Keep them safe; 3.Be there; 4.Help them connect; 5.Follow up. If you or someone you know is in crisis, call the toll-free National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (NSPL) at 1-800-273-TALK (8255), 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Another option is to chat online with someone at www.suicidepreventionlifeline.org. These services are free and confidential.

Sunday, September 10, 2017

The Demise of Polite Conversation

When did the art of pleasant conversation and open dialogue end? Every national new item – it seems – sparks vitriol that demands an alignment in one political camp or the other, one race or the other, or one sexual orientation or the other. I am afraid we have lost the ability to exchange ideas, to communicate freely, to learn from one another. To celebrate our differences rather than condemn them. Passionate speech and polite speech are not incompatible.

But I am afraid to speak, for fear my words are misinterpreted. I am afraid to write, lest my writing not encourage the thoughtful conversation I intended, but provoke a hateful backlash. Is it no longer possible to have civil discourse?

I am afraid to laugh, for fear my laughter is misconstrued. Can’t I both laugh at Tina Fay’s Saturday Night Live sheet-caking stunt, for example, as well as at Chad Prather’s “Unapologetically Southern” YouTube videos? At political cartoons of both the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times? Or is humor no longer funny, only hateful? Can’t we laugh at ourselves anymore, at our own hypocrisies? We all have them. I’m afraid we no longer recognize that; we are blinded by our self-interest.

I am afraid of social media. Facebook has unfortunately turned into a forum where, other than the annual birthday wish or mundane vacation photo, posts are filled with inflammatory opinions and commentary-as-fact with the self-righteous, ignorant replies that follow. Mob mentality sets in and people post things they would never say to your face. Hurtful – hateful – things.

Free speech is not the same thing as kind speech, uplifting speech, or frankly, intelligent speech. Nor should honest disagreement be labeled hate speech. Unfortunately, much speech today is designed to shut down the conversation by labeling one’s opponent –are they really an opponent? – a bigot, or by declaring they have no moral standing even to join the conversation. That is coercion, intimidation, and bullying no matter which side is doing it. That makes me very afraid.

I am afraid when I see fellow Christians deciding that following politics is more important than following the Ten Commandments. When they opt for strict party affiliation over and above "Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself" (Mark 12:31, KJV). And when they decide it is expedient to legislate hate, discrimination, and economic disparity while ignoring inconvenient moral issues like poverty and healthcare. What happened to being Jesus to those around us?

Rod Dreher, in his timely book The Benedict Option, notes that political victory does not vitiate the vice of hypocrisy. The socially liberal churches are just as guilty of blindly aligning with the Democratic Party as the fundamentalists are with the Republican Party. Could it be that Jesus understood this when he said, “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s” (Matthew 22:21, KJV)?

I am afraid our clumsy, partisan involvement has resulted in a political environment increasingly hostile to the very real – and very Christian – charitable work of the Church. We must redirect our gaze outside our church walls and into our increasingly diverse and desperate communities. Putting our faith to work on the ground speaks volumes and accomplishes so much more than legislating selective moral conformity.
It often takes a crisis – a disaster? – to bring the country together to work for the common good. Perhaps Hurricane Harvey will accomplish that. It appears to be doing so; I just hope it lasts.

Dreher wrote, "The state will not be able to care for all human needs in the future, especially if the current projections of growing economic inequality prove accurate.” Christians need to rediscover an ethic that marries personal responsibility with intentional charity and corporate love and respect. I fear we may have drifted too far to do so.

But I am afraid not to try.

Tuesday, April 5, 2016

Let's Not Get Trumped

I am ashamed. I wrote that phrase recently on a Facebook post of two Finnish friends who are looking across the ocean with a combination of disgust and disbelief at the Trump phenomenon. Consider my vow to avoid public political commentary this year broken.

The first president I ever voted for was Ronald Reagan in 1980. I have voted Republican ever since. But I will not vote for Trump if he is the Republican nominee. Don’t worry… I’m not voting Bernie Sanders, either. The socialist movement in the Democratic Party is just as disaffected and radical as the Trump wing of the Republican Party… and just as dangerous to our American way of life. We are not Finland. But with Sanders, you know what you get. With Trump, all bets are off.

Trump's campaign speeches are bullying and belittling, full of empty rhetoric and supportive of (indeed, encouraging) violence. I don't care how angry you are at the “establishment”; there is no place in American politics for Trump’s inflammatory, derogatory speech. Yes, he has a right to say those things. But shame on each and every American who jumps into the pig sty with him, eggs him on, and actually votes for him! Regrettably, all of us on the sidelines have been stained by Trump’s mud.

To my fellow Christians in particular, Trump – in his campaign rhetoric, at least – displays no evidence of being a Christian, which he claims to be. There, I said it. Forgive me if you think I am being judgmental, but I simply don’t see the fruit. This is not about waffling on various social issues on which well-meaning Christians can and do disagree. Consistently, his public demeanor is far from “Love God”, much less “Love thy neighbor as thyself.” If Trump loved anything as much as himself, we’d all be better off.

I don’t get how so many people – Christians in particular – are following like lemmings in the wake of a reality show Pied Piper – one who plays an enticing (but fundamentally deadly) tune. It is ironic that Jerry Springer, who long ago helped set the nasty reality TV tone that is emblematic of Trump’s campaign, can’t believe we would elect Trump as president.

I get that Trump is tapping into popular themes like immigration and "making America great again" – whatever that means – but the reality TV emperor has no policy clothes. In effect, Trump supporters are saying they want an angry president who doesn't know what he is doing. That is both startling and dangerous. Anger does not lead to sound foreign policy.

Trump's narcissism, lack of a verbal editor and foul speech suggest a personality disorder at a minimum. More worrisome, they expose a disturbing lack of compassion and respect for the innate value of other human beings. Add in a questionable moral compass and I truly fear the international fallout with his impulsive finger on the nuclear trigger. He’s just plain scary.

Ultimately, this column is not really about Trump. It is about me. By what ethic do I live my life and cast my vote? Do I believe that might makes right? Does the end justify the means? God forbid!

What about you?

If the Republican Party implodes (or if the Democrat Party nominates a Socialist), I do not blame the "establishment". I blame voters on both sides of the aisle who can't tell the difference between a slot machine and a voting booth. They just blindly pull the red or blue lever hoping for a jackpot. If only they could see, with that approach we are all going to lose.

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Social Media Diet for the New Year

I have resolved to start a new diet this year. Not the typical food diet, mind you – there is certainly nothing wrong with that. I am going on a social media diet.

When Facebook first came out, I signed up in order to keep up with my kids. They have long since moved on from Facebook. Instagram and especially Snap Chat are more the rage now. Meanwhile, I still troll Facebook’s News Feed several times a day looking for the occasional gem in the garbage can of posts and reposts. I guess I feel compelled to know what is going on in the lives of people I care about. Unfortunately, what most people share is not in the least what I care about.

You know exactly what I mean. I am happy to “like” a post about a significant event in someone’s life, be it a birthday, anniversary, or other meaningful milestone. But please don’t tell me about your bodily complaints, the thing your pet did that was only cute to you, or – hear me now, football fans – play by play about UT, A&M, Dallas Cowboys, or any other team. Think before you post: Is this post worthy of being eternally stored and linked to your name in the Cloud?

For every meaningful, personal post, I have to scroll through a dozen or more platitudes or opinions that only make me feel sorry for the person who wasted their time sharing such meaningless drivel. Even religious posts that may be important to you in the moment rarely have an impact on others. And I fear 2016 – with a presidential election around the corner – is going to be filled with poisonous arrows back and forth between staunch conservatives and bleeding liberals, whose posts are designed to demean and belittle their opponents (and by extension, their supporters). I want no part of that.

After my kids moved on from Facebook, Instagram became the draw. It still bothers me that every time I want to enlarge an Instagram post, my double tapping the photo (a la iPhone) I end up “liking” the photo instead. Then there is Twitter. @justinbieber has 72.4M followers, and is following 247.5K. I, on the other hand, have a measly 110 followers, most of whom I don’t know (and therefore I wonder why they follow me). To be honest, there is nothing (or no one) I follow that provides information I can’t get elsewhere, and there is nothing so urgent that a tweet would change anything I do.

Finally, there are the KTRE and Lufkin News app notifications that pop up on my phone. I tweeted KTRE at one point, saying (in 140 characters or less), “@KTREnews you send out too many alerts. I’ll give you one a day; make it a meaningful one! #wasteoftime” KTRE actually “liked” that tweet, but they still send out too many alerts.

I must admit, I made a conscious decision with both Instagram and Twitter to limit the number of people I follow. Even so, contemplating a social media diet is giving me angst. What will I miss? Who will notice if I don’t wish them Happy Birthday or “Like” their post? But that insecurity is simply pride. I know who I am and who my friends are, and I don’t need Facebook to confirm that for me.

Will I delete these apps entirely? I don’t think so. Will I restrict my viewing and posting? Absolutely. Just don’t judge me when you read this column after it is tweeted and posted on Facebook. It is a diet, after all, not total starvation.