Continue CPRIT Cancer Research Funding

The Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) was created in 2007 when Texas voters supported legislation setting aside $3 billion for cancer research and prevention. Since then, results have been measurable and effective. In addition to clinical services that have reached every county in Texas, more than 1,200 grants have been awarded to fund cancer research, product development, and cancer prevention. That amounts to up to $300 million in grant funding annually with 90% dedicated to cancer research. Those dollars have brought world-class research teams and amazing recognition to Texas.

One CPRIT scholar, Jim Allison, PhD, chair of Immunology and executive director of the Immunotherapy Platform at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, was awarded the 2018 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for launching an effective new way to attack cancer by treating the immune system rather than the tumor. Another, Sean Morrison, PhD of The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, was elected to the National Academy of Medicine. A CPRIT grantee, Livia Schiavinato Eberlin PhD, an assistant professor of chemistry at The University of Texas at Austin, won a MacArthur Foundation Fellowship, unofficially called a “Genius Grant”.

CPRIT is governed by an appointed nine-member Oversight Committee, who operate under a Code of Conduct and Ethics. CPRIT grants are merit-based and peer reviewed and given to Texas-based entities and institutions for cancer-related research, product development and the delivery of cancer prevention programs.

In my area, the Angelina County & Cities Health District participates with researchers at UT Tyler and with the American Cancer Society to provide colorectal cancer screening and prevention services to indigent and uninsured patients in the East Texas area. This is but one example of how CPRIT funding reaches a local community and an underserved population.

But CPRIT funding is at risk. Legislators are being asked to authorize $600 million in funding for CPRIT over the next two years as well as to pass a bonding authority bill that would ensure sustainability of CPRIT for another 10 years. Programs like CPRIT cannot limp along a year or two at a time; they need sustained funding in order to plan, implement, complete, and report out research and prevention successes and failures.

Some have questioned whether or not CPRIT funding, while “unquestionably noble”, is really an essential function of state government. I get it. But, CPRIT is more than cancer research and prevention. It is an investment in our state and our economy. More than 98,000 jobs have been created and $10.9 billion in economic activity has been generated through CPRIT programs. Ray Perryman, president and CEO of the Perryman Group, an economic and financial analysis firm based in Waco, Texas, said that for every dollar taxpayers have invested into CPRIT since 2007, Texas has gained $2 in tax revenue.

Public opinion is behind CPRIT as well. According to a poll conducted by Public Opinion Strategies, 70% of Texans would support reauthorizing the legislature to increase the bond issue for CPRIT by another $3 billion to extend the program for another 10 years. Nine out of ten voters (89%) say it is important for Texas to remain a national leader in cancer research and prevention by providing state funds for CPRIT.

Texas is doing the right thing when it comes to cancer research and prevention. We can all get behind CPRIT: for cancer research, for Texas, and for our future.

We Need Tobacco 21 Legislation Now

Who knew that candy apple, bubble gum, cherry cola, marshmallow, orange soda, s’mores, chocolate, and taffy were literally so addictive? Every one of those flavors – and thousands more! – are available in e-cigarettes today. Tobacco and e-cigarette use – seductively called vaping – are increasingly sucking our youth into a lifetime quicksand of addiction with health and financial costs certain to follow.

A coalition of many partners, including the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, American Heart Association, American Lung Association in Texas, Texas Medical Association, Texas Hospital Association, and numerous health systems throughout the state, have come together as Texas 21 to save lives by preventing tobacco use. One simple legislative change that Texas 21 supports can impact hundreds of thousands of lives down the line: raising the age to buy tobacco products to 21.

Almost all smokers start before age 21. In Texas alone, more than 10,000 kids become daily smokers every year. Lest you think raising the age to buy tobacco products to 21 is a radical idea, six states have already done so, as well as hundreds of cities across the country (including San Antonio in 2018). In fact, more than a quarter of the nation is covered by such T21 legislation.

My home county – Angelina County in deep East Texas – has the dubious distinction of ranking dead last in Texas for health behaviors according to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (accessible online at www.countyhealthrankings.org). Our higher than average adult smoking rate is a major factor in that determination. If we are to change the health behaviors of an entire county, we must address some factors more globally. Smoking is one of them.

Raising the smoking age to 21 will not have a big economic impact on retailers, as only 2% of US cigarette sales go to those under age 21. But the long-term impact on our taxes, of which too much goes to smoking-caused healthcare, will be significant. In Texas, Medicaid costs caused by smoking amount to almost $2 billion annually. Total annual healthcare costs in Texas directly caused by smoking reach nearly $9 billion. If fewer kids start smoking, we will – over time – see a significant decrease in smoking-related expenditures. Not to mention that our kids will enjoy longer and healthier lives.

Our children are so vulnerable to influence when they are in their early teens. On average, kids in the US try smoking for the first time even before they are 14 years old. They get their first cigarettes from older teens. Most high school seniors can legally buy cigarettes even before they graduate high school, because the legal age to purchase currently is 18. This gives younger teens easy access to nicotine and tobacco though their peers.

States and cities that have enacted T21 legislation have seen a significant drop in youth smoking initiation. The Institute of Medicine (now the Health and Medicine Division of the National Academy of Medicine) notes that raising the tobacco sale age will not only significantly reduce the number of adolescents and young adults who start smoking, it will reduce smoking-caused deaths and immediately improve the health of adolescents, young adults and young mothers who would be deterred from smoking, as well as their children.

It’s not just about cigarette smoking, though. E-cigarettes must be included in any T21 legislation. The tobacco industry, seeing overall declines in US smoking rates, cleverly (and sinisterly) purchased e-cigarette companies and began refining and marketing these nicotine delivery systems to our kids. Vaping became mainstream.

The power of the tobacco industry to addict people to nicotine is evident in the fact that e-cigarette company Juul – in which tobacco giant Altria owns a large stake – has grown quickly to be worth as much as $38 billion by some estimates. Juul’s annual revenue is said to be $2 billion. Addicting teens with flavors like mango, creme brulee, and mint has resulted in more kids using electronic cigarettes than regular cigarettes. In fact, e-cigarette use among youth is now considered to be an epidemic.

Juul and other vaping devices are not toys. Evidence continues to build that for young people, using e-cigarettes increases the likelihood of smoking cigarettes. Some of the chemicals in e-cigarettes are harmful as well. And the effects of nicotine on developing brains are not fully known. Especially worrisome is evidence that nicotine can cause impaired brain development, especially of the prefrontal cortex, which affects judgement and impulse control. To flavor a highly addictive chemical and sell it to children is not only sinister and dangerous; it is appallingly profitable for the very tobacco companies who have been driving up our healthcare costs killing us with cancer, heart disease, COPD, and many other illnesses for decades.

What can we do right now? Polls show nearly 70 percent of voters across party lines favor T21 legislation. Over half of voters strongly favor it. Sen. Joan Huffman and physician Rep. John Zerwas have introduced Senate Bill 338 and House Bill 749 — both of which include e-cigarettes — to protect kids from tobacco addiction and save lives by raising the tobacco age in the state to 21. This something we can all agree on. Let’s pass T21 legislation in Texas this session.

The Truth about Big Tobacco

There was some big, big news recently that you probably haven’t heard. After years of legal wrangling, the tobacco industry has not only been found guilty of fraud, conspiracy, and racketeering, but they have been ordered to run television and newspaper ads admitting the truth that they fought so hard to suppress for decades.

Let’s go back to the beginning. It was more than 50 years ago, in 1964, when Luther Terry, the 9th Surgeon General of the United States, issued a landmark report linking smoking to lung cancer and a host of other diseases. Since that time, Big Tobacco lied, deceived, and in every way engaged in a no-holds-barred battle against every attempt to regulate or curtail the sale of tobacco products. In the meantime, tens of millions of U.S. citizens have died prematurely from tobacco use.

In 1999, the Department of Justice took on Philip Morris and other tobacco giants under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), alleging that the tobacco companies had engaged in a decades-long conspiracy to (1) mislead the public about the risks of smoking; (2) mislead the public about the danger of secondhand smoke; (3) misrepresent the addictiveness of nicotine; (4) manipulate the nicotine delivery of cigarettes; (5) deceptively market cigarettes characterized as “light” or “low tar,” while knowing that those cigarettes were at least as hazardous as full flavored cigarettes; (6) target the youth market; and (7) not produce safer cigarettes.

Seven years later, in 2006, Federal District Court Judge Judy Kessler ruled that Philip Morris and other tobacco companies engaged in fraud, conspiracy and racketeering – all to deliberately deceive the American public about the health risks of smoking and secondhand smoke. Her ruling noted that Big Tobacco had “marketed and sold their lethal product with zeal, with deception, with a single-minded focus on their financial success, and without regard for the human tragedy or social costs that success exacted.” Judge Kessler ordered that these companies admit their guilt publically by running newspaper and television ads detailing their deception.

It took eleven more years – and a lengthy appeal process – for Big Tobacco to finally agree to any sort of public mea culpa about the health effects of smoking and their role in addicting hundreds of millions of people. Their watered-down admissions of guilt (known in legal parlance as “corrective statements”) will appear in about 50 newspapers and for a year on major television networks. One startlingly honest (and obvious) fact that must be publicized is that Altria, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA intentionally designed cigarettes to make them more addictive.

Think about that. At a time when we rightly are criticizing pharmaceutical companies for how they market pain medications (which actually have a therapeutic use), we still give a pass to the companies that market the most addictive, useless, and deadly product around. At least Big Tobacco now must admit publically that “More people die every year from smoking than from murder, AIDS, suicide, drugs, car crashes, and alcohol combined.”

Other statements you may see are, “Many smokers switch to low tar and light cigarettes rather than quitting because they think low tar and light cigarettes are less harmful. They are not,” and “There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke.” Sadly, we have known all of this for years. No, decades.

These ads started on November 26, but I have yet to see one myself. I wonder if anyone who needs to see them will see them. Major newspapers and even television are not the way our vulnerable youth consume media these days. I am sure Big Tobacco is counting on that.

In the meantime, tobacco sales continue at a brisk pace. A Wall Street Journal article in April of this year noted that revenues for U.S. tobacco companies hit $117 billion in 2016, up from $78 billion in 2001, despite lawsuits, rising taxes and declining smoking rates. Americans spent more than $90 billion on cigarettes in retail stores last year.

Stores that sell tobacco products today are complicit in the very deception that Big Tobacco is guilty of. The retail markup of tobacco products, according to the Wall Street Journal, is 17%, higher than that on groceries. No wonder grocery and convenience store chains put tobacco products front and center in their stores – or even out in front of their stores. Easy money. Dirty money.

The conservative/libertarian argument about supply and demand and “personal choice” is, pardon the pun, smoke and mirrors when people are knowingly addicted to the product in question. Cigarettes are not sugar water. I don’t mind companies making a profit – even obscene profits – as long as it isn’t by addicting us and killing us.

If nothing else comes from this mea culpa – these “corrective statements” – I hope tobacco and related products become so regulated and so taxed that not only is it not possible to become addicted, but it is too expensive for our youth to even consider starting. Nothing short of a world without tobacco will do. Perhaps that is a pipe dream, but our kids are worth it.

Moving the Needle on Health in Angelina County

Back in January, I wrote about the abysmal county health rankings in Deep East Texas and the fact that Angelina County has been named the county with the highest obesity rate in Texas. Almost four out of ten of us aren't merely overweight, we are downright obese. Let’s just admit it; we’re fat. And that fatness is a major factor in the development of high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, and many cancers, among other illnesses. 

Obesity is a two-edged sword that is both killing us early and costing us a lot in terms of ongoing healthcare expenditures and lost productivity. Smoking is, of course, another huge factor in our high cost of healthcare and poorer health outcomes. We must do better.

The rhetoric on the national stage is all about the skyrocketing cost of health insurance and how to tweak (or get rid of) Obamacare, as if that would solve our healthcare problems. The government can’t do it for us, folks. Regardless of what happens with healthcare reform, we need to collectively get off our fat behinds and take more responsibility for our own health. We need to do this individually, yes, but we also need to work on this as a community.

I mentioned in January the groundwork being laid by the Texas Forest Country Partnership. They hosted a series of strategic planning sessions to set goals for growth across a broad spectrum of our regional economy, from forestry and tourism to manufacturing and healthcare. Part of their healthcare recommendation was to raise our county health rankings in the region.

Since then, the $1 billion Episcopal Health Foundation, whose goal is to improve the health of the 10 million people living throughout the 57-county region served by the Episcopal Diocese of Texas, hosted a community meeting in Nacogdoches specifically to deepen their relationship with organizations working to improve community health in this area. Other foundations have expressed a similar interest.

But let’s be very clear: no foundation or partnership is going to do the work for us. We all have to be involved. The amazing thing about Angelina County is the number of resources we already have, along with the incredible people behind them! These resources need to intentionally focus on both individual and community health and work in a coordinated effort to put the pieces of our health puzzle together.

Hospitals must strengthen community outreach, especially with diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and cancer education. Physicians must expand care for the indigent in our communities. It is our duty. The Angelina County & Cities Health District deserves our full support for the incredible care they already provide, but they can and must do more. That requires funding, whether from grant support, state government, or from within Angelina County. Their primary care outreach is crucial to the health of our county.

Organizations like the American Cancer Society, The Coalition, ADAC, and the Burke Center must expand outreach and education about healthy lifestyles and disease prevention, cancer screening, smoking cessation, and immunizations. Women’s Special Services at CHI St. Luke’s Health Memorial will continue to apply for grants for low income women to get breast and cervical cancer screening. 

Lufkin went smoke free years ago and is better off for it. What about other cities? Diboll? Angelina County? Texas? Our state legislators need to use that proposed bathroom bill as toilet paper and instead pass smoke free legislation, which we know will both improve the health of our communities and save taxpayer dollars.

Chamber businesses need to provide or strengthen wellness programs for their employees, encouraging healthier lifestyles, diet, exercise, and smoking cessation. Maybe if people had to climb two flights of stairs to buy their cigarettes rather than drive through a barn or stop at a convenience store, fewer people would smoke. And they’d lose weight while they were at it! Is it just as easy for us to shop for healthy foods as it is tobacco and junk food? How do we encourage and facilitate healthy eating?

Our educational institutions from elementary school through college should have comprehensive, intentional programs to promote health and exercise. It is discouraging when I see employees at both our local hospitals riding the elevator to go up one floor when taking the stairs is much more beneficial.

Active events like the Neches River Rendezvous, Pineywoods Purgatory and Relay for Life are fantastic. What other events can we organize that will involve an even larger and broader swath of people year round? Find a reason to get outside. Participate in a fun run, even if you simply walk a mile or two. A stroll around the zoo can be good exercise and lots of fun. Or, spend an hour or two hiking the trails at Kit McConnico Park. It’ll do your heart and soul good! 

City sidewalks have been a great addition in recent years. Use them! Our Parks and Recreation Department has a website with programs and classes as well. Do we have a master plan for parks and recreation activities? If not, maybe we should.

I have a dream of a coordinated community effort where healthy living concepts infuse everything we do. Will Angelina County catch the vision to join in this effort? Lifestyle changes are hard. Nothing happens overnight. Changes in community health are measured over years - decades, even. We cannot get discouraged. Slow, meaningful progress over time will make a difference.

One early step coming up is the Texas Forest Country Partnership Economic Summit November 7-8, 2017 at the Pitser Garrison Convention Center. Included in that Summit will be a Rural Healthcare Symposium. Though it will address more than just Angelina County healthcare, it will be an important venue to discuss and brainstorm together. The Texas Forest Country Partnership should continue to take the lead in bringing groups together, applying for and administering grants, and monitoring progress and effectiveness.

As we plan for a healthy new direction in Angelina County, I encourage everyone to get involved. Be prepared to work! Come up with concrete ideas that you (or your business or organization) are willing to implement. Where philanthropic support is necessary, we will approach local, regional, and national foundations for assistance.

We must become the change we want to see and move the needle on health in Angelina County out of the red zone and into the green. Who’s with me?

What I Learned in Medical School That Was Wrong

I recently attended my 30th medical school reunion at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. It was a grand time of reminiscing and reconnecting with war buddies from the trenches of medical school. Part of our reunion weekend included lectures on current hot topics, such as the absurdity and danger of the anti-vaccine movement. But the lecture most of us were anticipating was on what we were taught in medical school that turned out to be wrong.

The topic itself was quite an admission from one of the most prestigious academic institutions in the world. I mean, everything science tells us is true, factual, indisputable, and remains so forever, right?

One example where the teaching of the time was wrong was peptic ulcer disease. When we started medical school, surgery for ulcers was common. Ulcers were thought to be caused by stress-induced excessive secretion of acid in the stomach. The surgical procedure known as antrectomy (removal of the distal end of the stomach) and vagotomy (cutting the nerves that lead to acid secretion) was performed basically to stop acid production. But this was not a small operation. Patients were often left with really unpleasant gastrointestinal issues such nausea, vomiting after eating, and dumping syndrome (abdominal cramps and diarrhea after eating).

What we now know is that ulcers quite often are caused by a bacterium known as H. pylori, which can be easily treated with an antibiotic – to kill the infection – and antacids. Not only was this revolutionary (and simple), but the medical establishment refused to believe it at first. There were many reasons, but it just didn’t fit what they thought they knew. It was, so they thought, a psychosomatic illness. And bacteria weren’t thought to be able to live in the stomach. The Australian doctor who co-led the discovery was so desperate to prove his theory that he even drank a cocktail of the bacteria to prove his point. History shows he was vindicated. The whole bacteria/ulcer connection was a radical idea at the time. Yet it was right, and the two who discovered it were awarded the Nobel Prize in 2005.

In my own field of oncology, there has been significant progress over the last 30 years. We now cure 70% of cancer patients compared with just 50% a generation ago. It was still a fairly paternalistic time in medicine. You didn’t question what the doctor told you to do. Physicians were taught – wrongly – that we should treat all patients aggressively all the way up to the end of life; otherwise, we would be taking away hope and devastating our patients.

In retrospect, it seems obvious that was a ridiculous and cruel assumption. Informed consent demands honesty. Hope cannot be reduced simply to wanting to live one more day at all cost, especially when ravaged by an incurable disease. What about hope for reconciliation with estranged family members? Hope for a pain and symptom-free death? Hope to die at home surrounded by family and friends, not alone in an ICU? Of course, now we have an entire field of comfort care/palliative medicine – including hospice care – to help with end-of-life symptoms and care.

Another example is less about what we were taught that was wrong than with what we just didn’t know. My class of 1987 started medical school in 1983. The AIDS epidemic was so new at that time that we didn’t even know caused it. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) – originally called HTLV-III, or human T-cell leukemia virus – wasn’t even called HIV until 1986. Fear and judgmentalism drove much of the public and academic response to this novel epidemic. We even had a classmate die of AIDS before the identification of the virus was made. These were scary times. With HIV/AIDS, we were living in and experiencing a time when urgent research and rapid discovery were needed to fight a terrible (and terribly misunderstood) disease. Our own fear and prejudice slowed that effort down.

I am curious what we will admit to being wrong about when the current medical school graduates have their thirty year reunion in 2047. Perhaps a brilliant discovery about Alzheimer’s, for example, will turn the medical world upside down. That is an illness where everyone would rejoice in acknowledging what we either got wrong or just didn’t know. Of course, more or unique discoveries in the field of cancer prevention and treatment would be welcome. In any case, we must be willing to admit that we don’t know everything there is to know today, and that we just might be wrong about some things. However, in today’s political climate I am not holding my breath to hear a mea culpa from the scientific community any more than when H. pylori was discovered. Maybe I’m wrong…

Support Raising the Smoking Age to 21

The 85th Texas Legislative Session is in full swing. On Wednesday, February 15, a bill was filed in the House by Representative (and physician) John Zerwas (R) to raise the smoking age in Texas to 21 (so-called Tobacco 21, or T21 for short). A companion bill has been filed in the Senate. This is truly a bipartisan effort and is a great idea. For decades now, the legal drinking age has been 21. Tobacco kills far more people than alcohol, and almost all long-term smokers start smoking before they reach the age of 21.

Deep East Texas contains the lowest ranked counties in Texas for health outcomes, and part of that is due to our higher smoking rates. Nearly 90 percent of adults who smoke started smoking before the age of 18 and nearly 100 percent started by age 26. 18- and 19-year-old smokers are a major supplier of cigarettes for younger kids, who rely on friends and classmates to buy them. Raising the smoking age to 21 can help decrease our smoking rates as well as save tax dollars on future healthcare spending related to tobacco use.

Speaking of tax dollars, annual Texas health care expenditures directly caused by tobacco use amount to a whopping $8.85 billion, and we taxpayers bear part of that cost. The State Medicaid program’s total health spend as a result of tobacco use is $1.96 billion. No, we can’t save all of that, unfortunately, unless no one smokes. However, Jeffrey Fellows, PhD, in a Center for Health research report wrote, “Increasing the smoking age to 21 [in Texas] would result in 30,500 fewer smokers after three years, and lead to $185 million in reduced healthcare expenditures and productivity costs over five years. Lower cigarette excise tax revenue of $3.4 million would reduce the 5-year net savings; however the state would still generate a net financial savings of just under $182 million.”

It isn’t just about dollars; it’s about lives, too.

The Institute of Medicine predicts that smoking prevalence would decline by 12 percent if the national minimum age of sale was raised to 21. One of their models also predicted that raising the national minimum age of sale to 21 would result in approximately 223,000 fewer premature deaths, 50,000 fewer deaths from lung cancer, and 4.2 million fewer years of life lost for those individuals born between 2000 and 2019. Smoking kills.

In case you wonder if the tobacco companies think this will work, here’s a quote from a 1986 Philip Morris report (one of the largest suppliers of tobacco products worldwide): “Raising the legal minimum age for cigarette purchaser to 21 could gut our key young adult market (17-20) where we sell about 25 billion cigarettes and enjoy a 70 percent market share.” To the tobacco industry, it is always and only about market share and profit.

Raising the smoking age to 21 isn’t the only answer to our smoking and poor health epidemic. Many cities and even entire states have gone smoke-free. Texas needs to. Dietary and exercise components of good health also need to be emphasized. But if we can lessen the number of the next generation who start to smoke simply by increasing the smoking age of to 21, why wouldn’t we? That’s right… there is no good answer. For a healthier Texas and Angelina County, support Tobacco 21.

Add HPV Vaccination to Your Kids' Christmas List

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) refers to itself as the nation's health protection agency. Among other things, they monitor infectious disease outbreaks (such as Zika, influenza or AIDS), and they issue recommendations for vaccines and immunizations.
There is a quiet epidemic in our country, and it is oral/throat cancer related to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. We've known about HPV causing almost all cervical cancer for a long time, but the number of oropharyngeal cancers related to HPV infection has risen dramatically in recent years. Ever since actor Michael Douglas announced in 2013 that he suffered from HPV-related throat cancer, people realized HPV poses a threat not only to women, but to men as well.

HPV infection is very common. According to the CDC, 80 million people - about one in four - are currently infected in the United States. There are more than 150 related HPV viruses, but only a handful are responsible for causing most HPV-related cancers.

 HPV is so common that nearly all sexually active men and women get it at some point in their lives. Most of the time, people get HPV from having vaginal and/or anal sex. Men and women can also get HPV from having oral sex or other sex play. Sometimes no symptoms develop, and 9 out of 10 infections go away on their own within a year or two. However, the more serious HPV types can cause the infected person to develop cancer.

The CDC states that HPV infections can cause cancers of the cervix, vagina, and vulva in women; cancers of the penis in men; and cancers of the anus and back of the throat, including the base of the tongue and tonsils (oropharynx), in both women and men. This year in the United States, HPV will have caused more than 30,000 cancers.

The good news is that there are vaccines against the most significant cancer-causing types of HPV. But for vaccination to be as effective as possible, it needs to be given at age 11-12, before teenagers become sexually active. This isn't about whether or not our kids have sex; it is about lifelong risks of routine sexual activity.

Rather than get hung up on (or deny) how HPV infection happens - and the unpleasant types of cancer it can cause - we should put into practice what the CDC recommends and the American Cancer Society endorses: vaccination of our boys and girls.

As noted above, routine HPV vaccination of all children should be initiated at age 11 or 12. The vaccination series can be started beginning as early as age 9 and up to age 26, though late vaccination is not as effective.

There are several available vaccines, but Gardasil 9 (the newest version) protects against 9 types of HPV that are responsible for about 90% of cancers related to HPV and is now the sole HPV vaccine available through government programs. Even if someone has already had sex, they should still get HPV vaccine. (Even though a person’s first HPV infection usually happens during one of the first few sexual experiences, a person might not be exposed to all of the HPV types that are covered by HPV vaccines.)

According to Debbie Saslow, PhD, Director of Cancer Control Intervention for HPV Vaccination and Women’s Cancers for the American Cancer Society, “HPV vaccination has the potential to prevent tens of thousands of cancers and hundreds of thousands of pre-cancers each year." 

If you could prevent your child from getting cervical, vaginal, vulvar, anal, penile, and oropharyngeal cancer, why wouldn't you? HPV vaccination may be the best, long-term gift you can provide for your kids.

Empowered – and Inundated – by Pink

There is a minor malady that comes around every season. It is characterized by a drop in energy, glazed eyes, and a strong desire just to sit and do nothing. This condition usually strikes around mid-October and peaks about the end of the month. Luckily, it doesn’t long. After a week or two of wearing dark clothes and drinking Standpipe coffee, it resolves completely with no lasting effects. I call it pink fatigue.

October has barely begun and I have already been interviewed both for the City Hall Update about the upcoming Power of Pink! celebrations in Lufkin and Livingston and by KICKS 105 about breast cancer for their website. I have an on-air interview with Danny Merrell this morning. October 18th is the 5^th annual Power of Pink! event in Livingston, and October 20th is 24^th annual Power of Pink! in Lufkin. Nearly 500 women are expected in Livingston, and an incredible 800 women in Lufkin. And even though it is not a breast cancer-specific event, the American Cancer Society’s amazing Cattle Baron’s Gala is October 15th. October is a busy – and very pink – month!

I jest about getting pink fatigue, but I hope it never, ever happens. We cannot tire of fighting this disease. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women (246,660 new cases in the US anticipated this year) and the second most common cause of cancer death in women (40, 450 deaths predicted in 2016). Only lung cancer kills more women. The good news is that the cure rate for breast cancer that is caught early is really quite high. Today, most cases (61%) are diagnosed at a localized stage (no spread to lymph nodes, nearby structures, or other locations outside the breast), for which the 5-year survival is a stunning 99%.

The American Cancer Society reports that from 2003 to 2012, breast cancer death rates decreased by 1.9% per year in white women and by 1.4% per year in black women. Overall, breast cancer death rates declined by 36% from 1989 to 2012 due to improvements in early detection and treatment, translating to the avoidance of approximately 249,000 breast cancer deaths. That is truly remarkable!

But we must not succumb to pink fatigue until ALL women who need mammograms are getting them. Our minority communities, for example, still fall behind when it comes to getting mammograms and other screening tests.

The American Cancer Society recommends that women at average risk of developing breast cancer should have the choice to start annual breast cancer screening with mammograms beginning age 40 to 44. Women age 45 to 54 should get mammograms every year. Women age 55 and older should switch to mammograms every 2 years, or have the choice to continue yearly screening. Always, the risks of screening as well as the potential benefits should be considered.

These guidelines are for women at average risk for breast cancer. Women with a personal history of breast cancer, a family history of breast cancer, a genetic mutation known to increase risk of breast cancer (such as BRCA), and women who had radiation therapy to the chest before the age of 30 are at higher risk for breast cancer, not average-risk, and should talk to their doctor about appropriate screening. If in doubt, or you just can’t remember, get a mammogram every year. It is just easier that way.

Please don’t get pink fatigue! Support cancer research for prevention, early detection, and curative treatment for all by participating in something pink this month. Contact Lindsey Mott at 639-7613 for tickets to Power of Pink! Contact the American Cancer Society at 634-2940 for tickets to Cattle Baron’s Gala! Or go online to www.CHIStLukesHealthMemorial.org and click the link to purchase a pink flamingo for $15. Put it in your yard or at your office to show support for breast cancer awareness. All flamingo proceeds go to support patients in need right here at the Temple Cancer Center. Go pink! #BC4TheBirds

Prostate Cancer Screening Saves Lives

Over the last 30 years, I have been witness to a remarkable change in how we diagnose and treat prostate cancer. Prior to the mid-1980s, prostate cancer was detected most often when symptoms of advanced prostate cancer were present, such as bone pain from metastatic disease. Very few patients were diagnosed at a curable stage.

The PSA (prostate-specific antigen) blood test came into wide use around 1986 when the FDA approved it for monitoring known prostate cancer. In the early 1990s, physicians started ordering it to detect early, asymptomatic prostate cancer. A spike in prostate cancer diagnosis happened. This wave of patients was a boon to treating physicians, primarily urologists who operate on prostate cancer, but also for radiation oncologists who treat cancer with various types of radiation. More early diagnoses also led to more clinical trials about how best to treat prostate cancer.

We learned a lot. Techniques for removing the prostate got better with the advent of robotic-assisted prostatectomy, as did precision and dose of radiation delivery with intensity modulated radiation treatment. The 15-year relative survival rate for prostate cancer is now an astounding 95%.

But we also learned that not every man with prostate cancer needs treatment.

How can we say this? How can we diagnose someone with cancer and then say, “Oh, by the way, you don't need to do anything about it”? Add to this confusion the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation to do away with screening altogether because of the risk of over-diagnosis and harm. In my opinion, that is a dangerous step backward for many of us guys who will get prostate cancer.

Granted, we are too aggressive about treating some prostate cancers. It is easy to vilify doctors who are incentivized to treat rather than watch and wait. But I think a big part of the problem in the US is that patients don't want to be told they have cancer and nothing needs to be done about it, especially when all this wonderful technology exists and insurance will pay for it.

What’s the solution?

We have very good tools now for determining aggressiveness of an individual patient's prostate cancer. That, along with evaluation of a patient's age and overall health status, helps us predict quite well whether or not a particular patient's prostate cancer will ever be a problem for them without treatment. Over treatment can be just as much of an error as under treatment or the wrong treatment. Know all your options for treatment if you need it; no single treatment is right for everyone. Get a second opinion if you haven’t gotten a good explanation about your need for treatment and what your full options are. And, yes, don’t even get screened for prostate cancer if your age and health status are such that you wouldn’t benefit from treatment anyway.

In the near future, there are certain pathologies that we call cancer now that we will no longer label as malignant, as they simply don't act like cancer. (It is a lot easier to say we don't need to treat a condition if we don't call it cancer.) In addition, genetic testing may add to our ability to individualize decision-making based on aggressiveness and risk of spread and progression of disease.

The American Cancer Society continues to support screening for prostate cancer, because they know that screening saves lives. If you are 50 or older – 45 for African American men – and are likely to live for ten years or more, get a PSA blood test. Do it regularly. Go to www.cancer.org for more information. Man up; take charge of your health.

Colorectal Cancer Screening: 80% by 2018

Katie Couric has raised awareness of colorectal cancer ever since her husband died of the disease in 1998. Yet colorectal cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States, only surpassed by lung cancer. Both are preventable: lung cancer by not smoking, and colorectal cancer by screening for and removing precancerous polyps.

The American Cancer Society has teamed up with the CDC (the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and other organizations to set an ambitious goal of screening 80% of eligible people for colorectal cancer by the year 2018. Screening for colorectal cancer is incredibly important because removing precancerous polyps actually prevents colorectal cancer. Across the nation, if 80% of the eligible population gets screened, it would prevent 277,000 new cases of colorectal cancer and 203,000 deaths (270 of those in Angelina County!) within 20 years. Those are staggering numbers.

Why so high? Because one in three adults in the United States between ages 50 and 75 – about 23 million people – are not getting tested as recommended. In Texas in 2016, there will be 9,680 new cases of colorectal cancer and 3,520 deaths. This translates in Angelina County to about 36 new cases and 14 deaths this year alone. Remember, these are preventable deaths.

How are we going to achieve this screening goal locally?

The Angelina County & Cities Health District, CHI St. Luke’s Health Memorial, the Temple Cancer Center and our local gastroenterologists have teamed up with the American Cancer Society and CPRIT – the state-funded Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas – to educate our area population and screen eligible patients for colorectal cancer through a cooperative grant headed by UT Tyler. Most insurances cover routine screening, but this group stands ready to make sure that any eligible patient, whether insured or not, has access to life-saving screening and, if a cancer is found, treatment as well.

There are many ways to be screened, but I want to focus on the two most available. These two  - colonoscopy and FIT testing – are also funded under the CPRIT grant and by almost all insurances. Having a colonoscopy is the best test, in my opinion, because if any polyps are found they can be removed right then and there. If the colonoscopy is negative, nothing else needs to be done for 10 years! My wife and I had ours done the year we turned 50, and it really is not a big deal. Yes, you have to do a bowel prep to clean out your colon, but that is a small price to pay for peace of mind for 10 years.

The second test covered under the CPRIT grant – and the one that will be done most often at the Health District – is the FIT (fecal immunochemical) test. It is a test for hidden blood in the stool, which can be an early sign of colon cancer. This test is done at home by using a small brush to collect some stool and place it on a test card. The test kit is then mailed back to the clinic for processing. The FIT test must be done every year, as opposed to the colonoscopy every 10 years, but it is cheaper and doesn’t require a bowel prep. If the FIT test is positive, a colonoscopy is then necessary.

If you are between the ages of 50 and 75 and have not had a colonoscopy in the last 10 years or had an annual FIT test, ask your doctor to schedule you for one. If you do not have insurance, call Angelina County Connects at (936) 633-1442 and ask the eligibility specialists if you qualify to be screened under the CPRIT grant. Let’s work together to prevent cancer and get to 80% by 2018!

Lung Cancer Screening Saves Lives

For more than 50 years now, we have known the dangers of smoking. That smoking causes heart disease, emphysema, and lung and other cancers is not in dispute. For fifty years, we did not have an effective screening tool for lung cancer.

Now we do.

Medical imaging has improved so much that we are now able to do computerized tomography (CT) scans with significantly lower dose to the patient and at a low enough cost to warrant widespread use as a screening tool. Not everyone needs a scan, of course. But smokers who are at high risk of developing lung cancer now have an option for screening, much like mammography for early detection of breast cancer.

In 2011, the results of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) were published in the New England Journal of Medicine, arguably the foremost medical journal in the world. This trial screened current or former heavy smokers aged 55 to 74 with low-dose CT scanning of the chest and compared it to standard chest x-ray. The NLST primary trial results show 20 percent fewer lung cancer deaths among trial participants screened with CT compared to those who got screened with chest x-rays. This is huge news, because we haven’t cured a lot of lung cancer over the last 50 years! Based on these results, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) decided in 2015 to start paying for the procedure on January 1, 2016.

According to the American Cancer Society, in 2016 an estimated 224,390 people in the U.S. (117,920 men and 106,470 women) will be diagnosed with, and 158,080 men and women will die of, cancer of the lung and bronchus, the leading single cancer killer in the U.S. If everyone who was eligible got screened, more than 30,000 deaths from lung cancer could be averted every year.

There are more than 94 million current and former smokers in the U.S. at high risk for lung cancer. In 2014, an estimated 18.1 percent, or 40 million U.S. adults, were current cigarette smokers. Unfortunately, smoking rates in East Texas are higher than state and national averages. That means a lot of East Texans are eligible to be screened.

Starting last fall, CHI St. Luke’s Health Memorial began offering low-dose CT lung cancer screening to eligible patients. Medicare covers ages 55-77 (commercial insurance 55-80, but Aetna 55-79). Even within those age ranges, an eligible patient must be a current smoker (or quit no more than 15 years) with at least a 30 pack-year history of smoking (for example, smoking 1 pack per day for 30 years, or 2 packs per day for 15 years). And, eligible patients must have no symptoms of lung cancer (such as coughing up blood or unexplained weight loss of more than 15 pounds in the last year). If lung cancer is suspected, a standard CT chest should be done.

Finally,  Medicare requires “shared decision making” on the risks and benefits of lung cancer screening, which means you must meet face to face with your primary care provider to get an order for screening.

Since we started screening at CHI St. Luke’s Health Memorial, more than 70 patients have been screened. Six abnormalities have been found (including an incidental kidney mass), and two lung cancers have been diagnosed. Those two cancer patients’ lives may have been saved by screening; only time will tell.

Of course, the best way to prevent lung cancer is by not smoking. Ever. Quit if you do smoke. And if you meet the criteria listed above, talk to your doctor about getting screened for lung cancer. If you have questions, feel free to contact the Temple Cancer Center at (936) 639-7466 for more information.

Cancer Brings Out a Range of Emotions

I hate cancer.

Hate is a bad word, I know. My mother always got on to me when I said I hated something or someone. We raise our children not to hate, because hate is one of those harmful emotions and temperaments that threaten to make us less than human. Of course, kids are prone to tantrum-throwing exaggeration when it comes to hating. Lima beans, anyone?

But I am a cancer physician and I truly hate cancer. It is insidious… evil… scary.  I respect cancer - like I respect a wild animal - but I still want to kill it.

I hate some things that cause cancer. Like smoking. I don't hate the smoker, and – though some may disagree – I am not in your face about smoking. I also discourage other lifestyle decisions or factors that increase our risk of cancer (tanning, obesity, etc.). But I don't hate people. We are, after all, human. And, I know all too well that I could be next to get cancer, whether it is from something I did or did not do.

As a matter of fact, I fully expect to get diagnosed with cancer. Perhaps you should, too. I'm not being morbid, just realistic. As a man, all things being equal, my chance of developing invasive cancer at some point in my lifetime is 42%. Women have a lifetime probability of 38%. Notice, I did not say I fully expect to die from cancer. Today, the odds of surviving cancer are well in my favor. The American Cancer Society reports that over the past 3 decades, the 5-year relative survival rate for all cancers combined has increased 20% among whites and 23% among blacks. Today, roughly 7 out of 10 cancer patients are cured.

Contrary to popular belief, the overall incidence of cancer is declining. It may seem that more people we know are getting cancer, because as we age our risk goes up. The principal reason for lower rates of cancer is fewer people smoking. And the biggest factor of persistently elevated cancer risk, especially in deep East Texas, is also smoking. East Texans still smoke more than the rest of the state. I applaud Stephen F. Austin University for their recent decision to join other college campuses in going smoke- and vape-free. The current trend of vaping is a dangerous prelude to smoking for young people and needs to be stopped dead in its tracks.

As I said, I do not hate people who have cancer. On the contrary, I have a great deal of compassion for those diagnosed with cancer. Their fighting spirit motivates me. I applaud the new American Cancer Society “Advantage Humans” ad campaign highlighting traits that emerge with a diagnosis of cancer, such as courage, defiance, and anger. The ads are positive but edgy, acknowledging that raw emotions are real and battling cancer is tough.

Of course, preventing cancer – where we can – is still the best option. How? Don’t smoke; vaccinate against human papillomavirus (HPV); don’t tan; screen for colorectal and cervical cancer. Catch cancer early with mammograms and low-dose CT for lung cancer. And treat cancer appropriately per national guidelines such as those developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Go to www.cancer.org for tremendous resources, and stay local for treatment where you have excellent facilities and the support of family and friends.

It is ok to hate cancer. In a strange way, our humanity is enhanced by hating what is evil (while also clinging to what is good, Romans 12:9). But use that hate constructively to motivate yourself to prevent, to fight, to come together, and ultimately to win.

Cattle Baron's Gala Supports Local Cancer Patients

I always look forward to the Pineywoods Cattle Baron's Gala. Not only do I have a good time, I know the money raised is going to a great cause - the American Cancer Society. Unfortunately, there has been recurrent grumbling - from what I hope is an unenlightened minority - that the money raised doesn't stay local. I understand this "local first" mindset and agree that we should expect local return on our charitable giving. The American Cancer Society delivers that in spades.

Yes, the American Cancer Society is a national organization. But did you know that the American Cancer Society has a regional office building right here in Lufkin? This office was built thanks to generous local foundation, business, and individual support. Did you know this office houses eight employees and serves a 12-15 county region? Annual payroll, benefits and overhead is about $450,000 per year. These are good local jobs that feed back into the local economy at a time when all local jobs are significant.

But it isn't just about the jobs. Every dollar raised has local impact in many more ways. Since I started practice in Lufkin nearly 23 years ago, the overall cure rate for cancer has increased from 50% to over 70%. That translates to local lives saved, not in small part due to the incredible research funded by the American Cancer Society. Statistically, an additional 120 people who come through the Temple Cancer Center every year are cured! Now, that is local impact!

Did you know that the American Cancer Society National Cancer Information Center in Austin handles close to 1 million requests for cancer information annually, including calls from Lufkin and deep East Texas? Those calls, emails and online chats provide direct, one-on-one support and information about local services for local patients, including navigation and information on how to access insurance coverage when possible. (By the way, some of these services, like rides for patients to appointments, require local drivers. You can volunteer to help!)

Did you know that every new cancer patient seen in the Temple Cancer receives accurate, specific educational material provided by the American Cancer Society? And local cancer patients have access to wigs, supplies, and support services whether they receive treatment locally or not.

Did you know that the American Cancer Society funds efforts to increase screening rates for cancer? More than 4.6 million women in need have been helped since 1991 through the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program. The latest project is to screen 80% of the eligible population for colorectal cancer by 2018. Colorectal cancer screening can find and remove polyps before they become cancerous, and that prevents colorectal cancer. And what about the incredible American Cancer Society work in the area of tobacco control? Locally, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network was instrumental in the passage of smoking ordinances in both Lufkin and Nacogdoches.

What about local patients who choose to travel to the Texas Medical Center for treatment? Soon they will have access to free lodging at Hope Lodge Houston provided by - guess who? - the American Cancer Society. The TLL Temple Foundation generously provided the lead gift for the Hope Lodge Houston. 

What about the various treatments we recommend for cancer patients? Those treatments very well may have been developed from research supported by none other than the American Cancer Society. The American Cancer Society has funded an incredible $4 billion in research grants since 1946. In Texas alone, this year nearly $36 million is currently invested in research.

Website presence? The American Cancer Society's website, cancer.org, is the most trusted website available when it comes to cancer information, with 61 million hits logged in 2014.

The suggestion that funds raised by American Cancer Society events don’t stay local (or don’t benefit our local community) simply can't be supported by facts. Not only that, it misses the point that we can accomplish so much more together than what we can by ourselves. Isn't that our community spirit anyway?

Join me this Saturday night, October 10th, at the Moore Farm for the 2015 Pineywoods Cattle Baron's Gala in support of the American Cancer Society’s lifesaving cancer research, education, and truly local services. Call (936) 634-2940 for ticket information.

Cancer is a Global Problem

Tomorrow is World Cancer Day. We think we have a cancer problem in the US, and we do. But other countries, especially the poorer ones, are truly suffering. Two publications by the American Cancer Society - Cancer Atlas and The Global Economic Cost of Cancer (which I quote extensively) - soberingly detail the scope of the problem.

For example, 6 out of 10 cancer patients would benefit from radiation therapy (my specialty) in the course of their cancer treatment. However, about 20 countries in Africa do not have a single radiation treatment facility. And even when radiation facilities are available, as is the case in several countries in Africa and Asia, coverage is woefully inadequate. Ethiopia, a country of around 90 million people, is served by a single radiation treatment center located in the capital city.

Similarly, although morphine to treat cancer pain is plentiful, safe, and easy to use, millions of terminally ill cancer patients in Africa and Asia die in pain because of regulatory restrictions, cultural misperceptions about pain, and concerns about addiction. Eighty-five percent of the global population lives in low- and middle-income countries, but consumes just 7% of the medicinal opioids, like morphine.          

For the first time, research has shown that cancer has the most devastating economic impact of any disease in the world. The total economic impact of premature death and disability from cancer worldwide was $895 billion in 2008, nearly 19 percent higher than heart disease. And, that figure does not include direct medical costs.

Cancers of the lung, bronchus, and trachea account for the largest drain - nearly $180 billion - on the global economy. That's not surprising, given that smokers die an average of 15 years earlier than nonsmokers. Tobacco is predicted to kill seven million people annually by 2020 and eight million per year by 2030, with more than 80 percent of the deaths taking place in low- to middle-income countries. One-third of those deaths are the result of cancers. This is almost entirely preventable.

And it isn't just lung cancer. Despite the fact that most cases of cervical cancer can be prevented or treated effectively, 274,000 women die from the disease yearly. Approximately 241,000 of these deaths are among women in low- and middle-income nations. And then there's breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and on and on.

It seems like all we hear about on the global stage is HIV/AIDS and malaria (and, more recently, Ebola) - the so-called communicable diseases. But the economic loss from HIV/AIDS ($193.3 billion) TB (45.4 $billion) and malaria ($24.8 billion) combined is not even 30 percent of the economic loss of cancer.

Why should you care?

Put simply, the global cancer epidemic is huge and is set to rise, according to World Cancer Day planners. Cancer treatment and pain management for those dying of cancer are not political issues. They are global health issues which we in the United States, with our expertise and yes, wealth, can tackle better than any other country. They are also the type of moral issues which donors and politicians of every stripe can come together to address. 

This will require effort on the part of organizations like the American Cancer Society and other NGOs, but it will to an even larger degree depend on the leadership of the United States in organizations like the United Nations and the World Health Organization, whatever you think of them. And it will depend on you. Support the American Cancer Society and ACS CAN - the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network - so that we can create a world with less cancer and more birthdays.

My Bar Code Diet

In December 2013, I wrote a column about my brother's heart attack and my wakeup call to lose weight. I promised to report back on my progress. I just didn't think it would take this long!

The reason you haven't heard from me earlier is because the first several months were spent researching weight loss techniques and plans rather than actually doing anything about it. As a matter of fact, I gained an additional eight pounds while contemplating dieting, which proves that just thinking about food adds weight!

We love to talk about losing weight. Actually doing it is much harder. It takes commitment. And, we only commit to something we truly think will work. I am happy to report now that not only did I lose the weight I gained, I lost an additional eleven pounds. So, I am now 19 pounds down from my max!

How did I do it? Wait for it...

Diet and exercise! I used to joke that bulimia was better than exercise. Bad joke. I did not go that route. I opted for the simple math: calories in < calories out.

It was not as difficult as I thought it was going to be, once I made some key decisions. First, I had to stop eating hospital food. I just didn't know how many calories I was eating! More importantly, I had to track how much I was eating.

Hence, my Bar Code Diet. If I couldn't scan it into my phone, I didn't put it in my mouth, with rare exceptions. There are iPhone and android apps (like Lose It or My Fitness Pal) which will help you set a goal for weight loss. You enter your starting weight, your target weight, and how much you want to lose per week. Generally, 1-2# is typical. The apps then tells you how many calories per day you can eat and how long it will take you to get to your goal, assuming you are compliant with the diet. You scan the bar code with your smart phone and it tracks how many calories you eat. You can even track calories burned with exercise. These apps have many chain restaurant menus on file, so it is possible to eat out and still track your calories. I don’t recommend it, though, because portion sizes in restaurants are generally huge and it is hard to stop mid meal.

Every day starts with breakfast. Even if it is only a latte, you need to consume some calories (including some carbohydrates) within 30 minutes of waking up to reset your hormone and blood sugar levels.

My favorite meals to take with me are Hormel Compleats (not frozen, but need to be microwaved) or Zone bars (taste great and are easy to grab and go). And in the evening at home, often an Atkins frozen meal is quite satisfying, plus it limits carbs in the evening, which can keep you from getting hungry in the middle of the night (or from waking up starving). Of course, our metabolism slows as we age, so exercise (including some strength training) is essential. Even walking can be a great start if you haven’t done any exercise at all.

This isn’t fad dieting. It is simply counting calories. Anyone can do that nowadays. Not only did I lose nineteen pounds, I also dropped my cholesterol 40 points. I don't have acid reflux anymore. I sleep well at night. I feel better. And I know that my risk of both heart disease and cancer will be less as a result.

Winning the War on Cancer

“I have cancer.” What is your first reaction when someone tells you that? Not the same as when you hear, “I have diabetes,” or, “I high blood pressure.” Something about cancer scares the bejesus out of us. But, should it?

Twenty-plus years ago, when I first started practice, I would quote that we cured around fifty percent of patients. People didn’t believe me then, and you may not think we cure that many today. In fact, we now cure fully two-thirds of cancer patients! We have made remarkable progress in the war on cancer, thanks in no small part to the work of the American Cancer Society. In lung cancer alone, there has been a 20% decline in cancer death, largely due to decreased rates of cigarette smoking.

We just celebrated the fiftieth anniversary of the Surgeon General’s report on smoking and health. This major report, relying on research conducted by the American Cancer Society, exposed the lies of the tobacco industry and laid to rest any doubt that smoking causes lung cancer. We still don’t cure very many lung cancers today – about 15 out of 100 – but we can prevent the vast majority of cases. Since the Surgeon General’s report, eight million lives have been saved, and almost 20 years of life have been added to those lives saved!

Unfortunately, lung cancer is a global problem. There were six trillion cigarettes consumed in 2009! Last century, tobacco killed 100 million people worldwide. This century, tobacco is projected to kill 1 billion people, mostly in the developing world.

Decreasing lung cancer death rates in the United States is just one success story. Over the last nearly 40 years, breast cancer cure rates have increased from 75% to 90%, colon and rectal cancer cure rates have risen from around 50% to two-thirds, and prostate cancer 5-year survival has gone from 68% to 100%. How did we do it?

Better yet, how did YOU do it? You got your mammograms, Pap smears, PSA blood tests, and colonoscopies. You prevented cervical cancer by taking care of precancerous lesions found on Pap smear, or by getting your HPV vaccine. You prevented colorectal cancer by having precancerous polyps removed. You caught your breast cancer or your prostate cancer early by getting a mammogram or a PSA blood test. You noticed a mole changing and had it removed. YOU took charge of your health!

But there is a new danger lurking: obesity. Predictions are, obesity will surpass tobacco as the leading cause of death in the next two decades. Like with tobacco, both cancer and heart disease risk are increased with obesity. Fighting obesity is a lifestyle change, for sure. To change up an old phrase, “An ounce of prevention… is a TON or work!” And, unlike screening tests, you have to work at the diet and exercise continually. (Funny how I preach to myself in these columns!)

Anyway, next time you hear someone say, “I have cancer,” know that they are quite likely going to beat it. The war on cancer isn’t over. We still need to support research, provide prevention and detection programs, work for access to quality healthcare programs, and advocate for smoke-free public places. Walk in Relay for Life on Friday, May 2, 2014 at 6:00 PM at Lufkin Middle School! Support the Cattle Barons Gala, which will be October 25th! The American Cancer Society is the backbone in the fight against cancer. Finally, be a friend and encourager to those with cancer. It’s all about more birthdays, after all!

Your Role in Cancer Prevention

Cancer. Got your attention now? I live and breathe cancer. It's my job. Who knows, I may die with cancer. But my odds are improved because of some choices that I make. First of all, I do not smoke. Ninety eight percent of the patients I see with lung cancer either smoke or have smoked, and lung cancer remains the most preventable cause of cancer death. I try not to get too much sun exposure. That's not easy living in Texas (and driving a convertible). I also exercise regularly and strive to maintain a healthy weight. Finally, once I turned 50, I had my first screening colonoscopy in case there were any polyps that needed to be removed. Removal of polyps can prevent colorectal cancer. My wife, for her part, has regular mammograms (to detect breast cancer early when it is highly curable) and Pap smears (again, to detect changes that could lead to cervical cancer).

Of course, that does not guarantee that I won't get cancer. But the good news is that we cure two-thirds of cancers today. That's right... cure. Most people mistakenly think of cancer as a death sentence. Of course, if you get lung cancer, your chance of cure may only be about 15%. Terrible. Especially since it is almost always preventable. But if you detect breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer early - some of our most common cancers - cure rates run 80-90% or greater. Fantastic!

What are you doing to improve your cancer risk? Do you smoke? Quit! Are you overweight and inactive? Diet and exercise! Are you getting your mammograms, Pap smears, screening colonoscopies, checking your skin for irregular or changing moles? Take charge of the risks that you can.

It is not enough to cure cancer or just diagnose cancer earlier. We want to prevent cancer altogether. What can YOU do to help us win this fight?

Participate in CPS3 - Cancer Prevention Study 3! The American Cancer Society has undertaken a huge, nationwide, multiyear study to better understand the lifestyle, environmental and genetic factors that cause or prevent cancer. If you are between the ages of 30 and 65 years old and have never been diagnosed with cancer, you are eligible to enroll.

Participating is easy and involves the following:

1. Read and sign an informed consent form.

2. Complete a survey packet which will ask for detailed information on lifestyle, behavioral, and other factors related to your health.

3. Be measured for waist circumference.

4. Give a small blood sample (similar to a doctor’s visit). The blood sample is drawn by a trained, certified phlebotomist.

5. Completing a mailed survey every few years over the next 20-30 years

All personal information and any individual results of blood analyses that may be performed will be kept strictly confidential by CPS-3 research staff. There will be no cost to you to participate.

Enrollment will be available at the following locations, your choice:

Tuesday, October 15th (7:30am–11:00am) - Memorial Health System of East Texas, Lufkin

Tuesday, October 15th (4:00pm–7:30pm) - C. L. Simon Recreational Center, Nacogdoches

Thursday, October 17th (1:30pm–5:00pm) - After Power of Pink! at Lufkin Convention Center

Saturday, October 19th (9:00am–12:30pm) - Lufkin Industries

Sunday, October 20th (9:30am–1:00pm) - Lufkin First Assembly of God Church

We need 500 people locally to enroll, and we need ALL racial and ethnic groups to participate. To sign up, go to cancerstudytx.org or call toll-free 1.888.604.5888. Do it for your friends or loved ones who have had cancer. With your help, we can finish this fight!